Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Nov 10;31(3):425–441. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01899-z

European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders—version 2.0. Part III: pharmacological treatment

Veit Roessner 1,, Heike Eichele 2,3, Jeremy S Stern 4, Liselotte Skov 5, Renata Rizzo 6, Nanette Mol Debes 5, Péter Nagy 7, Andrea E Cavanna 8, Cristiano Termine 9, Christos Ganos 10, Alexander Münchau 11, Natalia Szejko 12,13,14, Danielle Cath 15, Kirsten R Müller-Vahl 16, Cara Verdellen 17,18, Andreas Hartmann 19,20, Aribert Rothenberger 21, Pieter J Hoekstra 22, Kerstin J Plessen 23,24
PMCID: PMC8940878  PMID: 34757514

Abstract

In 2011, the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS) published the first European guidelines for Tourette Syndrome (TS). We now present an update of the part on pharmacological treatment, based on a review of new literature with special attention to other evidence-based guidelines, meta-analyses, and randomized double-blinded studies. Moreover, our revision took into consideration results of a recent survey on treatment preferences conducted among ESSTS experts. The first preference should be given to psychoeducation and to behavioral approaches, as it strengthens the patients’ self-regulatory control and thus his/her autonomy. Because behavioral approaches are not effective, available, or feasible in all patients, in a substantial number of patients pharmacological treatment is indicated, alone or in combination with behavioral therapy. The largest amount of evidence supports the use of dopamine blocking agents, preferably aripiprazole because of a more favorable profile of adverse events than first- and second-generation antipsychotics. Other agents that can be considered include tiapride, risperidone, and especially in case of co-existing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), clonidine and guanfacine. This view is supported by the results of our survey on medication preference among members of ESSTS, in which aripiprazole was indicated as the drug of first choice both in children and adults. In treatment resistant cases, treatment with agents with either a limited evidence base or risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects might be considered, including pimozide, haloperidol, topiramate, cannabis-based agents, and botulinum toxin injections. Overall, treatment of TS should be individualized, and decisions based on the patient’s needs and preferences, presence of co-existing conditions, latest scientific findings as well as on the physician’s preferences, experience, and local regulatory requirements.

Keywords: Tics, Tourette syndrome, Pharmacotherapy, Medication, Treatment

Introduction

The first European clinical guidelines for Tourette Syndrome (TS1) were published in 2011 [1] by working groups of the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS) and provided recommendations for the assessment and treatment of TS based on existing guidelines, meta-analyses, reviews, clinical trials, and case studies up to that point. The present guideline provides clinicians an update of recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of TS in Europe using evidence from clinical trials and clinical expertise.

In general, clinical guidelines rely on the combination of information from controlled clinical trials (including their shortcomings) and clinical (consensus-based) knowledge, given the lack of sufficiently comprehensive and detailed evidence. Regarding TS, the situation mentioned in our 2011 article with “…only a limited number of studies on pharmacological treatment options for TS met rigorous quality criteria…” still holds true. Especially head-to-head comparisons of different agents or their combination as well as optimal treatment duration and dosage have not been systematically investigated, hence calling for an approach supplemented by knowledge from clinical practice. Moreover, the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in reducing tics varies between trials as a result of differences in methodology and patient characteristics. Furthermore, controlled studies in treatment resistant cases are lacking. It remains common practice to have to try various options until an effective reduction of tics is achieved [2].

Recently, a systematic review and guidelines of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) for the treatment of TS have been published [3, 4]. The authors of the AAN guidelines used structured, evidence-based methodology as outlined in the 2011 edition of AAN's guideline development process manual. To formulate new European recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of TS, we complemented the English-language literature since 2011 and combined it with the results of a survey among ESSTS experts, who were asked about their pharmacological daily practice in children and adults with TS.

Methodology of selection of agents and literature search strategy

To select relevant agents, we combined agents with at least moderate or low evidence according to the guidelines of the AAN [3, 4] with those mentioned in our European survey. For these agents, we reviewed the English-language literature since 2011 in PubMed using the agent’s name in combination with “tics”, “tic disorder”, or “Tourette Syndrome”, including children, adolescents, and adults as search string. In addition, we checked the references since 2011 of other systematic reviews/meta-analyses [59], existing guidelines [3, 4, 1012], non-systematic reviews on TS with statements about pharmacological treatment, i.e., dealing with various agents [1338] or mentioning treatment in their title [3964]. In addition, we had a look into the references of agent-specific reviews and meta-analyses of (in alphabetical order) aripiprazole [6572], atypical antipsychotics [73], botulinum toxin [7485], cannabis [8688], clonidine [89, 90], complementary alternative medicine [91], deutetrabenazine [92], non-dopaminergic agents [93], traditional Chinese medicine [94], and topiramate [95, 96]. Moreover, we screened references of reviews on specific aspects of TS if they describe treatment options for co-existing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [97103], obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD; [104, 105], autism and stereotypies [106, 107], adverse events of pharmacological treatment in TS [108, 109], and treatment resistant TS [110].

Agents from recently published AAN guidelines

The authors of the AAN guidelines included only systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of tics that included at least 20 participants. They concluded that there is “….moderate confidence that haloperidol, risperidone, aripiprazole, tiapride, clonidine, botulinum toxin injections, 5-ling granule, and Ningdong granule were probably more likely than placebo to reduce tics….”. Lower confidence was reported for pimozide, ziprasidone, metoclopramide, guanfacine, topiramate, and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Strong confidence was demonstrated only for behavioral approaches for tics (for detailed description of the behavioral approaches consult Part II of our guidelines).

Agents mentioned in the ESSTS survey

In the survey of the ESSTS Guidelines Group conducted in 2019, ESSTS experts’ prescription practices for the treatment of TS were gathered. They were asked which medication they would consider as first, second, third, and subsequent choices, provided absence of contra-indications for the available agents and absence of co-existing conditions. Contrary to our prior survey from 2011 [111], we also asked the experts to give their recommendations separately for children/adolescents and adults.

In general within the answers of 59 clinicians, choices in children/adolescents did not differ from those in adults and pointed to a high preference for aripiprazole in both age groups. The main difference between the age groups was that haloperidol was much more commonly considered in adults, while in children/adolescents tiapride was more often mentioned (for details consult, Table 1). When comparing the results of our ESSTS surveys performed in 2011 and in 2019, a clear shift over the last decade can be seen from risperidone, pimozide, and (ami)sulpiride in favor of aripiprazole (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Preferences of agents for treatment of TS

Children and adolescents (n = 15 different agents were given) Adults (n = 14 different agents were given)
Points Percentage Points Percentage
141 29.2 Aripiprazole 127 31.0 Aripiprazole
82 17.0 Clonidine 70 17.1 Haloperidol
81 16.8 Tiapride 37 9.0 Clonidine
49 10.1 Guanfacine 32 7.8 Risperidone
25 5.2 Atomoxetine 26 6.3 Quetiapine
20 4.1 Risperidone 20 4.9 Botulinum toxin
18 3.7 Topiramate 17 4.1 Cannabinoids
18 3.7 Cannabinoids 14 3.4 Pimozide
15 3.1 Pimozide 11 2.7 Guanfacine
11 2.3 Amisulpiride 11 2.7 Amisulpiride
8 1.7 Tetrabenazine 10 2.4 Topiramate
5 1.0 Quetiapine 10 2.4 Atomoxetine
4 0.8 Haloperidol 9 2.2 Tetrabenazine
3 0.6 Botulinum toxin 8 2.0 Tiapride
2 0.4 Sertraline 8 2.0 Sertraline
1 0.2 Sulpiride
483 100 410 100

Choices are given separately for children/adolescents and adults. We received 50 responses for children/adolescents and 45 responses for adults (from 50 ESSTS experts; overlap in many cases). We rated each first-choice agent with 4 points, a second-choice agent with 3 points, a third-choice agent with 2 points, and additional agents with 1 point. To enable a comparison of the preferences between both age groups we calculated percentages

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Results from ESSTS surveys on preferences of agents for the treatment of tics in 2011 compared to 2019. In 2011, responses from 22 TS experts were received, while in 2019 50 ESSTS experts (45 responses for treatment in adults and 50 in children/adolescents, findings shown together). Each first choice agent was rated with 4 points, a second-choice agent with 3 points, a third-choice agent with 2 points, and additional agents with 1 point. In 2011, 1 point was given for desipramine, thioridazine, oxcarbazepine (not shown in the figure)

We also collected experts’ opinion on the reason for starting pharmacological treatment of TS. Fifty-nine clinicians treating patients with TS who were members of ESSTS (95% from Europe) regarded as most important reason that the “patient/parents requested medication”, followed by “behavior therapy had not been successful”, and finally “high severity of tics”. While 81% of clinicians would use pharmacotherapy as first-line to treat severe tics, in the case of moderate tics this was done only by 34%, and in the case of mild tics by 3% of clinicians (for detailed description of the survey’s results consult Part V of this issue).

Selection of agents to be discussed in detail

From the moderate confidence group in the AAN guidelines [3] all agents except 5-ling granule and Ningdong granule were commonly prescribed by ESSTS experts (see Table 1). From the lower confidence group only ziprasidone and metoclopramide were not prescribed by ESSTS experts. Vice versa, amisulpiride, tetrabenazine, quetiapine, sertraline, atomoxetine, and sulpiride were mentioned by ESSTS experts as prescribed agents but not in the list of agents with at least moderate or low evidence according to the AAN guidelines.

Dysfunction of transmitter systems as basis for psychopharmacological treatment

TS has been associated with a dysfunction of many neurotransmitter systems, especially the dopaminergic system [39, 112]. Based on findings from nuclear imaging studies, four hypotheses on dopamine dysfunction in TS have been postulated: (1) dopamine hyper-innervation within the striatum; (2) supersensitive postsynaptic striatal dopamine receptors; (3) presynaptic dopamine abnormality in dopa carboxylase; and (4) elevated intrasynaptic dopamine release as a result of an imbalance between tonic and phasic dopamine levels [112]. Besides a dysfunction in the dopaminergic system, imbalances in other neurotransmitter systems have been suggested including serotonergic, noradrenergic, glutamatergic, GABAergic, cholinergic, histaminergic, endocannabinoid, and opioid systems [34, 39]. These findings give some rationale to use substances other than dopamine blocking drugs particularly for the treatment of tics resistant to dopamine-modulating agents.

Dopamine-modulating agents

The first agents used in treating tics were first-generation antipsychotics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), e.g. haloperidol (in 1969) and pimozide (in 1984), whereas aripiprazole was approved in 2014. In European countries, only haloperidol has been licensed for TS [113]. Discrepancies concerning the licensing of the same agents in Europe and the US largely stem from differences in interests of pharmaceutical companies between the US and Europe. In general, adverse effects of dopamine receptor antagonists are broad, ranging from extrapyramidal adverse effects including acute dystonia, parkinsonism, and akathisia to metabolic adverse effects including weight gain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, lipid spectra abnormalities, blood pressure changes, fatigue, headache, body temperature dysregulation, hyperprolactinemia, and sexual dysfunction, increase of prolactin levels, and QTc-prolongation as well as ‘behavioral’ changes, such as concentration problems, apathy, anhedonia and sedation, aggression, anxiety, and agitation [114, 115]. The limited existing evidence does not allow to predict individual potential adverse effects preceding the start of treatment [116]. Regarding hyperprolactinemia, antipsychotics with tight D2-binding predictably lead to hyperprolactinemia (“prolactin-raising”), whereas antipsychotics with loose D2-binding and partial agonistic action (e.g., aripiprazole) are considered as “prolactin-sparing” [117]. While most experts recommend measurement of prolactin levels before and during treatment with antipsychotics, long-term effects of hyperprolactinemia on sexual, bone, and breast development without accompanying acute clinical symptoms are unknown. Accordingly, the question of whether switching to another antipsychotic only because of hyperprolactinemia (without any clinical symptoms) is still a matter of debate [109, 118].

First-, second-, and third-generation antipsychotic agents are all being used in TS. First generation antipsychotics show predominantly extrapyramidal adverse effects and sedation, while second-generation drugs have more metabolic adverse effects (i.e., weight gain, disturbed blood lipid spectra, a higher risk of diabetes, and other metabolic adverse effects [108, 119, 120]). Second- and third-generation antipsychotics are more widely used and have a mode of action that is distinct from first generation antipsychotics’ mode of action, by their binding to both dopamine and 5-HT2 receptors, i.e., their 5-HT2A receptor antagonism [51]. In line with this observation and despite the absence of regulatory approval for their use in TS for the majority of agents (with the exception of aripiprazole in the US), treatment recommendations favor the use of newer generation antipsychotics rather than first generation antipsychotics as first line treatment for tics, predominantly because of a more favorable tolerability with respect to extrapyramidal adverse effects [111, 115, 121]. In the following paragraphs we review the various antipsychotics that may be used as treatment of TS.

First-generation antipsychotics

Haloperidol

Haloperidol was the first antipsychotic medication proven to be effective in the treatment of TS and is in the EU still the only agent with approval for TS. It is a potent dopamine antagonist, specifically against dopamine D2 receptors. It also blocks muscarinic acetylcholine receptors as well as adrenergic receptors and has a well-documented effectiveness in tic reduction [6, 111]. Since 2011, no new English-language RCTs have been published in TS. The most recent meta-analysis (including also Chinese-language RCTs) of haloperidol as treatment for TS pointed to a standardized mean difference compared with placebo of 3.20 (95% CI [0.14–6.52]) [6].

However, due to considerable adverse effects (particularly parkinsonism, apathy, anhedonia, and QTc-prolongation), the use of haloperidol as treatment of TS has decreased within the last three decades from being a first-line agent to being used only in carefully selected, severely affected, and otherwise treatment resistant patients [3, 4, 10].

Pimozide

Pimozide is a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist which also blocks calcium channels. In the past, it has been one of the most frequently used medications in the treatment of tics [115] despite only a limited number of trials comparing its effectiveness to placebo or other agents [122]. Since 2011, no new English-language RCTs have been published in TS. Although several reviews give some support that pimozide is effective as treatment of tics, a recent meta-analysis (including also Chinese-language RCTs) did not find that pimozide is significantly better than placebo [6]. Moreover, due to its prominent adverse effects including drowsiness and risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), although to a lesser extent as compared to haloperidol [9, 122], weight gain (less than risperidone, but more than aripiprazole), sedation [9, 122124], and the risk of QTc prolongation [9, 122], its application has declined noticeably [125]. Similar to haloperidol, in current guidelines it is recommended only in severely affected and otherwise treatment resistant patients [10, 12].

Second- and third-generation antipsychotics

Risperidone

Risperidone acts through a dopamine D2 receptor and 5-HT2 receptor antagonism [126]. It is one of the best studied antipsychotics for the treatment of tics [16].

Three systematic reviews [8, 9, 90] describing the effect of risperidone on tics have been published since 2011, indicating that risperidone is effective in reducing tics. The most recent meta-analysis (including also Chinese-language RCTs) of risperidone as treatment for TS pointed to a standardized mean difference compared with placebo of 3.47 (95% CI [0.37–6.87]) [6]. One RCT [127] in 60 subjects compared the effects of aripiprazole and risperidone in children and adolescents over a 2-month period, with the conclusion that both medications were tolerated well, with equal effectiveness and similar adverse effects, including increased appetite in over 25% of the participants for either agent. Risperidone, in contrast, was superior in improving the patients' social functioning in the short term.

In terms of adverse effects, 35% of children with tics using risperidone developed EPS in a prospective longitudinal study on antipsychotic safety monitoring [128]. Risperidone-related weight gain seems to follow a pattern with a significant increase of body mass index (BMI) in the first month, followed by only a slow increase thereafter [129, 130]. Increase of prolactin levels was present in 41% of the children treated for tics [128].

Aripiprazole

Aripiprazole reduces dopaminergic neurotransmission through D2 partial agonism [131133]. Thus, it modulates neurotransmission in dopaminergic (mainly mesolimbic and mesocortical) pathways. In addition, it is a partial 5-HT1A agonist and a 5-HT2A antagonist [131134]. Aripiprazole has become a frequently used agent for the treatment of tics due to its good effectiveness on tics and less prominent adverse effects [50, 69, 72, 73, 111, 135].

Until 2011, the use of aripiprazole was only reported in case studies, retrospective observational studies, and open-label trials [51]. Thereafter, aripiprazole has become the main focus in research on the pharmacological treatment of tics: seven systematic reviews including five meta-analyses or combinations of the two [6, 8, 66, 68, 69, 71, 72] and two placebo controlled RCTs [136, 137] have been published since 2011. All publications consistently documented the effectiveness of aripiprazole in reducing tics, with similar effect sizes as compared to other dopamine-modulating agents, such as haloperidol and risperidone [6, 127, 138]. The most recent meta-analysis (including also Chinese-language RCTs) pointed to a standardized mean difference of aripiprazole compared with placebo of 4.74 (95% CI [1.06–8.67]) [6]. Moreover, there is some evidence from an open-label study that aripiprazole may also have a positive effect on co-existing conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and auto-aggression in adults with TS [135], as well as on social adjustment and parental stress [139]. However, it may have an unfavorable effect on complex learning tasks [140].

Aripiprazole has a more favorable profile of adverse effects compared to other antipsychotics with lower risk of akathisia and other EPS, anxiety, constipation, dizziness, headache, insomnia, nausea, and vomiting in patients with TS [6, 8, 111, 137]. Based on a study in children and adolescents with TS, aripiprazole has a safer cardiovascular profile than pimozide, with a lower frequency of QTc prolongation [125]. Importantly, aripiprazole is less sedating than most other antipsychotics in patients with psychosis [141]. However, more recent literature showed a mean EPS incidence of 17.1% (95% CI 12.8–22.3%) in children and adolescents with a variety of psychiatric disorders treated with aripiprazole [142]. As described in other antipsychotic agents, children gain more weight due to aripiprazole than adolescents and adults [120, 137], but among all antipsychotics aripiprazole has a relatively favorable metabolic profile [143].

Benzamides

Tiapride

Tiapride, a benzamide with low antipsychotic action, acts as a selective dopamine antagonist at dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. Despite its frequent use, particularly in German speaking Europe, the evidence on its effectiveness in the treatment of tics in controlled trials is still sparse [52, 144]. While tiapride is not available in the US [145], in recent years, there was a growing interest in this agent in other countries, such as China [6, 138] and two Chinese guidelines recommended tiapride as first-line medication (Chinese medical association [11]; Chinese Child Neurology Society [12]).

Since 2011, there has been one new English-language RCT [138] and more than 10 Chinese-language RCTs (not cited here, for an overview see [6])—the first ones after the small scale RCT from 1988 [146]. Since 2011, five reviews including one meta-analysis [6, 8, 69, 71, 72] covered also tiapride for the treatment of tics, while others did not even mention tiapride [40, 58]. The most recent network meta-analysis of 14 available RCTs (all conducted in China) did not find that tiapride is significantly better than placebo [6], which is in contrast to the recommendations of the AAN [3] and both Chinese [11, 12] guidelines based on RCTs. Interestingly, a recent study on therapeutic drug monitoring in 49 pediatric patients (83.7% male, mean age = 12.5 years) found a positive correlation between tiapride dose (median 6.9 mg/kg, range 0.97–19.35) and serum concentration albeit with marked inter-individual variability. The variation in dose explained 57% of the inter-patient variability in tiapride serum concentrations; age, sex, and concomitant medication did not contribute to the variability. Tics improved in 83.3% of the patients. 27.1% of the patients had mild or moderate adverse effects [147].

A meta-analysis comparing the effects of different antipsychotics in TS [6] demonstrated that the most common adverse effects in patients with TS treated with tiapride are dizziness, nausea, and dry mouth, while EPS are rare [138, 145]. However, quite rarely EPS might be observed in case of a steep drug increase in the initial phase of treatment or with irregular drug intake. Of note, tiapride can be successfully used to treat (tardive) dyskinesias due to antipsychotics [145, 148].

Noradrenergic agents

Noradrenergic agents such as clonidine and guanfacine are more commonly used in children and adolescents than in adults and mainly in those patients with a combination of ADHD and mild tics given their efficacy in treating ADHD symptoms in addition to tics.

Clonidine

For the treatment of tics, clonidine, an α-2 adrenergic agonist, has been used more commonly in America than in Europe [111] and is available as an oral and transdermal preparation. A systematic review [8] concluded that the balance of clinical benefits to harm favors the α-2 adrenergic receptor agonists clonidine and guanfacine (based on four studies with low risk of bias dating before 2011). However, the authors reported substantial heterogeneity with studies with transdermal application of clonidine being less effective compared to oral administration. The most recent meta-analysis of clonidine as treatment for TS pointed to a small standardized mean difference compared with placebo of 0.29 (95% CI [0.12–0.47]) [90]. This meta-analysis [90] indicated that the effect size of α-2 adrenergic agonist on tic reduction is much larger in children with tics plus ADHD (95% CI: 0.36–1.01) than in individuals with tics without ADHD (95% CI: − 0.06–0.36). Moreover, a prospective, open trial in 41 children and adolescents in whom previous treatment with a D2-dopamine receptor antagonist was ineffective or not well tolerated indicated a response rate of 63% after 12 weeks of treatment with a clonidine transdermal patch [149]. Unfortunately, the authors did not report effects on co-existing ADHD.

A systematic review of adverse effects of α-2 adrenergic agonists in children and adolescents with ADHD demonstrated hypotension, bradycardia, and sedation with clonidine as well as guanfacine [150]. Abrupt withdrawal of α-2 adrenergic agonists may cause rebound hypertension [151]. Therefore, blood pressure and pulse should be measured at baseline and monitored during dose adjustments and follow-up. In addition, monitoring of symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular problems (e.g., exercise intolerance, dizziness, and syncope) is recommended [152].

Guanfacine

Guanfacine, another α-2 adrenergic agonist, may reduce tics and improve ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents. However, in a recently published small-scale randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in children and adolescents (50% of the guanfacine, 22% of the placebo group suffered from co-existing ADHD) [153], guanfacine was not more efficacious than placebo in reducing tics. Previously, a meta-analysis of guanfacine as treatment for TS pointed to a standardized mean difference compared with placebo of 0.54 (95% CI [0.06–1.14]) [90].

The most common adverse effects of guanfacine are sedation, headache, fatigue, dizziness, irritability, upper abdominal pain, and nausea, with sedation and fatigue usually emerging within the first 2 weeks of dosing and then generally remitting [154]. Guanfacine may induce mania in children with a history or family history of bipolar disorder [155, 156]. Especially the extended release formulation of guanfacine may induce QTc prolongation [150], and therefore, patients should be monitored accordingly [3].

Other agents

Cannabis-based medicines

First reports of successful self-medication with the exocannabinoid cannabis date back to 1988 [157]. During the last years, more and more, mostly adult patients use cannabis as a self-medication and report beneficial effects [86, 158]. Indeed, there is an increasing number of case reports and small studies suggesting that cannabis-based medicines including cannabis flowers, cannabis extracts, and pure THC (dronabinol) might be effective in the treatment of tics and co-existing symptoms including ADHD. Since 2011, no new RCTs have been published. A recent meta-analysis on the two available small-scale RCTs (combined n = 41) demonstrated no significant benefit of THC compared to placebo as treatment of TS [159]. No serious adverse reactions were reported either, with only mild adverse reactions including dizziness, tiredness, and dry mouth [160, 161].

Botulinum toxin

In addition to the use of pharmacological agents with systemic effects, there is some evidence for the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections to treat persistent well-localized motor and, sometimes, vocal tics by temporarily weakening the associated muscles, through the inhibition of acetylcholine release from peripheral motor nerve terminals. In European practice this approach is limited to older adolescents and adults in patients with insufficient response to other treatments. According to the AAN guidelines on TS [3] botulinum toxin as local application is probably more likely than placebo to reduce tics. This judgement as well as several reviews after 2011 on botulinum toxin in TS [7485] are based on the only published randomized crossover trial of botulinum toxin injection versus placebo for the treatment of simple motor tics from 2001 conducted in 20 adolescents and adults [162]. Adverse reactions associated with botulinum toxin may include temporary soreness and mild muscle weakness including hypophonia when used in the throat region to treat disturbing vocal tics [163].

Topiramate

Topiramate is a sulfamate modified fructose diacetonide with unknown mechanisms of action. There have been no new English-language RCTs, since a 12-week randomized controlled trial of topiramate versus placebo published in 2010 that showed superior effects of topiramate compared to placebo in 29 children and adults with TS [164]. However, the authors of a recent meta-analysis [96] summarizing a total of 15 studies from China involving 1070 participants aged 2–17 years concluded that topiramate is a promising medication with good efficacy and tolerability for children with TS compared to haloperidol and tiapride.

While generally well tolerated at low doses (25–150 mg/day) it may cause a variety of adverse effects, including cognitive and language problems, aggression or mood swings, paresthesia, nausea, sweating problems, and decreased appetite [165].

Pharmacological treatment of tics in the context of co-existing psychiatric conditions

People with TS often suffer from co-existing problems, such as ADHD, OCD, mood disorders, anxiety, oppositional defiant disorder, and impulse control disorders (see Part I of this issue). The distress and burden associated with these co-existing conditions is often more significant to patients [166, 167] than the tics themselves. Although data are still limited [168], below, we present a possible approach for the treatment of co-existing psychiatric conditions in patients with TS.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

ADHD is prevalent in 30–50% of referred children with TS and is strongly associated with functional impairment [166, 167]. ADHD symptoms typically improve in adolescence [169], but some adults with TS may still need continued treatment for this co-existing disorder [170]. Several pharmacological trials have assessed medication for co-existing ADHD in TS. Across studies, therapeutic doses of methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, clonidine, guanfacine, and atomoxetine reduce ADHD symptoms as well as tics in patients with TS, probably through allowing a better self-regulatory control [99]. The α-2 agonists clonidine and guanfacine are among the agents with the most favorable efficacy-versus-adverse events ratio but effect sizes vary [8, 9, 90]. While earlier studies described that stimulants exacerbated tics or even caused first tics in some individuals [171], more recent studies demonstrated that tics do not emerge or worsen under the treatment with short-acting [172, 173] or short- and long-acting stimulants [174]; however, a transient increase may occur. On the contrary, a mild reduction of tics may occur in the treatment with methylphenidate in children with tics plus ADHD [99]. In rare cases with a persistent increase of tics after introducing a stimulant, the use of atomoxetine may be a viable alternative, which may in general have a positive effect on tics via a reduction of ADHD symptoms [3, 103]. When treating with psychostimulants, some adverse events should be taken into consideration: sleeplessness, nervousness, headache, blood pressure raise, loss of appetite, weight loss, and gastro-intestinal complaints. According to an open-label study aripiprazole results in an effective reduction of tics, but affects ADHD symptoms only moderately [175].

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)

Obsessive–compulsive behaviors are very common in people with TS, presenting frequently sensory-motor phenomena, such as urges and just-right feelings that may overlap with tics. Diagnostic criteria for OCD are met in up to 50% of people with tics [105, 176]. Trial data for OCD treatment in children (POTS II) suggest that individuals with tics respond as well to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as those without tics and respond equally well to cognitive behavioral interventions [177] in contrast to an earlier study indicating a less favorable response to sertraline [178]. In addition, for OCD co-existing with TS, behavioral therapy approaches are the first-line treatment [3]. Small observational studies suggest that individuals without sufficient treatment response to behavioral therapy alone may benefit from an added SSRI [105]. Some fixed-dose trials of SSRIs showed that in the treatment of OCD higher doses are significantly superior to lower ones; there is, however, an expected greater adverse effect burden with higher doses of SSRIs [179]. It is worth noting that SSRIs may not only reduce OCD symptoms but also alter overall affect, anxiety, and stress sensitivity, which may lead to better self-regulation and tic suppression. However, this has not been documented in an RCT.

In treatment resistant OCD in the context of TS, antipsychotic augmentation of treatment with SSRI using aripiprazole and risperidone may be considered [180]; the subgroup of patients with OCD and co-existing tics had a particularly beneficial response to treatment with antipsychotic augmentation in a meta-analysis [179]. However, it is important to keep in mind the limited evidence base and the need for drug safety monitoring, as pointed out in an observational study including children with tic-related OCD [180] as well as a meta-analysis including adults with OCD (without tics) [181].

Other co-existing psychiatric conditions

In addition to ADHD and OCD, people with TS are at risk of developing depression, anxiety disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, rage attacks, and mood disorders [176]. Co-existing mood disorders are more often seen in adolescents and adults than in children and in those with greater tic severity [3]. It is worth noting that there is an increased risk of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide in people with TS, also when statistically controlling for other co-existing psychiatric conditions [182]. Unfortunately, there are no treatment studies to guide the clinician in treating these co-existing problems.

Guanfacine and clonidine can be effective in individuals with co-existing impulse control disorder [90]. Aripiprazole and risperidone are useful for co-existing irritability and aggressive behaviors [183186].

Tics and stereotyped movements are frequent in Autism Spectrum Disorder, and a clear diagnostic distinction between them may be challenging to establish [28, 106]. Treatment with risperidone or fluoxetine may be considered in cases with stereotypies that are debilitating and involving harm and injury to self and others [187].

Clinical recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of TS

Decisions about treatment of TS should be based on a thorough and broad diagnostic process (see Part I of this issue). Behavioral therapy approaches are recommended as first line treatment, based on assumed better tolerability of behavioral therapy, because behavioral approaches might strengthen the patients’ self-regulatory control [3, 188] (see Part V of this issue). However, these are not always locally accessible (a major factor in many countries) or feasible because of low introspective ability in young age or low IQ, or due to low motivation or ability to invest time and effort required for practicing in behavioral therapy. For individuals with clear impairments associated with their tics or with a preference for pharmacotherapy, after psychoeducation pharmacologic interventions may be considered alone or in addition to behavioral therapy. This concerns especially situations, where tics impair quality of life and cause subjective discomfort (e.g., pain or injury) or when tics result in sustained social problems (e.g., social isolation or bullying) or cause functional interference (e.g., impairment of academic achievements) [111]. In addition, pharmacological treatment acts faster, because prescription, dispensing, and intake of first dose are easier than planning and commencing behavioral therapy. Moreover, first treatment effects are often seen within a few days, while after behavioral therapy first beneficial effects in most cases cannot be observed until after a few weeks. Therefore, pharmacotherapy may be preferred in situations, where a rapid tic reduction is urgently required.

The waxing and waning course (including its time course) of the tics in each individual should be taken into account when deciding on starting therapy and when evaluating treatment effects.

Independently from the individual factors that result in the decision to start pharmacological treatment of tics it is important to inform patients and their parents about what can be achieved by this kind of treatment to avoid too high expectations. On average, a tic reduction of 50% can be expected. However, some patients report a reduction of 90%, while others feel no or only minimal improvement.

The decision to propose a treatment with a specific agent is an individual choice made by the clinician, in collaboration with the patient and family and depends on the patient’s needs, preferences, and priorities as well as on the physician’s preferences, experience, and local regulatory requirements.

During the last decades, several agents have been suggested and used as rational medication for the treatment of tics. Based on evidence from RCTs and on clinical experience aripiprazole, tiapride, and risperidone for TS as well as clonidine and guanfacine for TS and co-existing ADHD are the best established options, all on the basis of off-label use. In general, we recommend a “start low, go slow” drug up-titration, meaning that the therapy should be initiated with the lowest dose possible and gradually increased. It is important to bear in mind that the antipsychotic dosages normally used for the treatment of tics are considerably lower than those used to treat psychotic disorders.

Depending on its individual receptor binding profile, each agent bears the risk of specific adverse effects. Therefore, not only effectiveness but also potential adverse effects of each agent should be taken into consideration when deciding about the most suitable agent for a patient with TS. Most pharmacological treatments discussed in these guidelines have well known adverse effects, including weight gain, drug-induced movement disorders, elevated prolactin levels, sedation, and effects on heart rate, blood pressure, and electrocardiograms. Therefore, careful monitoring of adverse events is recommended (see Table 2). In case of treatment discontinuation, gradual tapering off antipsychotic medications is recommended to avoid withdrawal dyskinesias [3].

Table 2.

Most common medications for Tourette syndrome and other chronic tic disorders

Medication Indication Start dosage (mg) Therapeutic range per day (mg) Effect size* Confidence in the quality of the evidence** Very common adverse events (> 10%)*** Physical and laboratory Examinations at the start and at follow-ups
α-2 adrenergic agonists
 Clonidine ADHD/TS 0.025 0.025–0.3 (titrated according to BP and HR) 0.29 (0.12–0.47) [90] Moderate Dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, dry mouth Blood pressure, ECG
First generation antipsychotics
 Haloperidol TS 0.25–0.5 0.25–3.0 3.20 (0.14–6.52) [6] Moderate Agitation, insomnia, EPS, hyperkinesia, headache ECG, weight
 Pimozide TS 0.5–1.0 1.0–4.0 0.42 (−0.07–0.90) [6] Low Dizziness, somnolence, hyperhidrosis, nocturia ECG, weight
Newer antipsychotics
 Aripiprazole TS 2.50 2.5–30 4.74 (1.06–8.67) [6] Moderate Somnolence, sedation Weight, blood lipids, and glucose
 Risperidone TS/DBD 0.25 0.25–3.0 3.47 (0.37–6.87) [6] Moderate Insomnia, sedation/somnolence, parkinsonism, headache Weight, prolactin, blood lipids, and glucose
Benzamides
 Tiapride TS 50–100 (2 mg/kg) 100–600 (2–10 mg/kg) 0.47 (−3.89–5.06) [6] Moderate Hyperprolactinemia*, sleepiness, insomnia, agitation, impassivity, vertigo, headache ECG, weight, prolactin
Others
 Botulinum toxin TS

Vocal tics: 1–2.5 U

Motor tics: 50–75 U

1–2.5

75–250

1.27 (0.51–2.03) [4] Moderate Weakness of the injected muscles

DBD disruptive behavior disorder; OCB obsessive–compulsive behavior; TS Tourette syndrome; ADHD attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BMI body mass index; EPS extrapyramidal symptoms; BP Blood pressure; HR heart rate; ECG electrocardiogram

Information on the adverse effects stems from the official Summaries of product characteristics, if no very common Adverse Events (> 10%), *standardized mean difference compared with placebo (including 95% confidence interval; positive number pointing to efficacy) according to the most recent meta-analysis (for botulinum toxin based on a single study), as referenced ** based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) as reported by AAN [4] ***common Adverse Events (< 10% and > 1%) are provided

An important aspect when choosing an agent for a patient is also the presence of co-existing conditions. Often, the co-existence of ADHD or OCD, as well as mood, anxiety, or impulse control disorders may be more disturbing to the patient than the tics [167] and may thus have important implications for the choice of medication. Evidence for those choices is still limited, but this differentiation already presents an important step towards an individualized approach to medication in TS.

While the evidence-based practice recommendations of the AAN did not present a hierarchical recommendation what agent should be given first, the ESSTS survey indicates that aripiprazole is now the most commonly used agent for the pharmacological treatment of TS for both age groups (children and adolescents, adults). This may be the result of several factors, one being the unique pharmacological profile as a dopamine partial agonist [189], but also the availability of several RCTs with sufficient sample sizes that document a favorable benefit-risk ratio, predominantly being the result of its positive profile of adverse effects [69, 70, 72]. Positron emission tomography studies demonstrated that the clinical effect of an antipsychotic emerges when more than 65% of striatal dopamine D2 receptors are blocked, and EPSs become apparent when the receptor blockade exceeds 80% [190]. Thus, in the ideal antipsychotic therapy (antipsychotic efficacy without EPSs), about 70% of striatal dopamine D2 receptors are blocked. When tight antipsychotics bind 70% of D2 receptors, the remaining 30% are available for endogenous dopamine to bind. This means that dopaminergic transmission is reduced to 30%, and both tonic/phasic components are suppressed equally. In one study, aripiprazole was effective at a dose of up to 20 mg, where 10% or fewer D2 receptors were available for endogenous dopamine to bind; however, EPSs did not appear, because aripiprazole exerted a partial dopaminergic agonistic activity [191].

Tiapride, the second most commonly prescribed agent in children and adolescents with tics, especially in Germany, has a similar working mechanism as aripiprazole, showing a maximum of 80% of dopamine receptor occupation even in the presence of excess tiapride concentrations [145]. Interestingly, for two of the most commonly used agents according to the ESSTS survey there is evidence from pharmacodynamic studies explaining their low (aripiprazole) or very low (tiapride) potential for EPS compared to haloperidol [69, 70, 138, 145].

Another recommended antipsychotic agent, risperidone, actually has a good evidence base, but is associated with weight gain and metabolic adverse effects.

The European survey documented that noradrenergic agents are the third most given agents regarding both age groups together. Importantly, noradrenergic agents have a low effectiveness in patients with tics only, but this substantially increases in patients (particularly children and adolescents) with the combination of tics and ADHD, both for reducing tics and symptoms of ADHD [8, 90]. Therefore, we recommend noradrenergic agents as first line treatment of mild to moderate tics in patients with co-existing ADHD, but less in those without co-existing ADHD as there they have only minimal benefits. However, in some patients with mild tics only, noradrenergic agents may be more acceptable than antipsychotics, based on more favorable adverse effects.

In treatment resistant cases, treatment with agents with sometimes a still limited evidence base and less frequently prescribed by ESSTS experts might be considered. Reasonable choices include antipsychotics including haloperidol, pimozide, quetiapine, sulpiride, and amisulpiride as well as cannabis-based medicines, topiramate, and botulinum toxin injections.

Haloperidol is still relatively often used in adults with TS, but rarely mentioned by any ESSTS expert as treatment option for children and adolescents. Its declined use can be explained by its unfavorable adverse effect profile compared to other antipsychotics, even though haloperidol is the only officially licensed substance for TS and tics in Europe, and has a long tradition and established efficacy in the treatment of TS, with relatively low costs.

Current limitations and future directions

In the light of the limited existing evidence several questions remain unanswered: most importantly, the effectiveness of combinations of behavioral therapy with pharmacological treatment and of different agents needs further trials. Studies directly comparing different agents or combinations of agents in TS are rare, and there is currently only one study [192] available that compared pharmacological treatment with behavior therapy, yielding equal effects within a study period of 10 weeks. Moreover, the study periods of published trials on pharmacological treatment of TS were quite short, e.g., in view of the natural waxing and waning course of tics in TS. In addition, research should be conducted on treatment sequencing and decision-making and for whom particular sequences of treatment are most effective [3]. Another area in need of further evidence is the treatment of patients with co-existing conditions. Moreover, questions around how to deal with treatment refractoriness remain unanswered [193]. The risk of adverse events when using specific agents needs further exploration, e.g., sudden death due to QTc prolongation [116], hyperprolactinemia and its consequences [109], and weight gain [128]. In addition, the questions of optimal treatment duration, as well as long-term outcome after discontinuation of a pharmacological treatment of tics remain unanswered. These important points for the pharmacotherapy of TS are still open to discussion due to a non-existent or too small base of evidence and are important areas for future research. Unfortunately, the number of new agents that might be effective as treatment of TS is limited. Perhaps most promising are the Chinese herbal medicine products 5-ling granule and Ningdong granule, which were classified as compounds showing moderate confidence in evidence of treatment effects according to the AAN guidelines, based on well-powered RCTs conducted in China. However, these products are currently not available to clinicians on the European market. One final future step to improve pharmacological treatment of TS would be precision medicine as well as personalized medicine [194] by prior genetic testing or the use of other neurobiological markers [195]. This approach, however, is still an aspiration for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as TS.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; FOR 2698).

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

VR has received payment for consulting and writing activities from Lilly, Novartis, and Shire Pharmaceuticals, lecture honoraria from Lilly, Novartis, Shire Pharmaceuticals, and Medice Pharma, and support for research from Shire Pharmaceuticals and Novartis. He has carried out clinical trials in cooperation with the Novartis, Shire, Servier and Otsuka companies. KMV has received financial or material research support from the EU (FP7-HEALTH-2011 No. 278367, FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN No. 316978), the German Research Foundation (DFG: GZ MU 1527/3-1), the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF: 01KG1421), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), the Tourette Gesellschaft Deutschland e.V., the Else-Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, and Abide Therapeutics, Almirall Hermal GmbH, GW pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Syneos Health, and Therapix Biosciences Ltd. She has received consultant's honoraria from Abide Therapeutics, Allmiral, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bionorica Ethics GmbH, CannaMedical Pharma GmbH, Canopy Grouth, Columbia Care, CTC Communications Corp., Eurox Deutschland GmbH, Global Praxis Group Limited, IMC Germany, Lundbeck, Resalo Vertrieb GmbH, Sanity Group, STADAPHARM GmbH, Synendos Therapeutics AG, and Tilray. She is/was a consultant or advisory board member for Abide Therapeutics, The Academy of Medical Cannabis Limited, Alirio, Aphria Deutschland GmbH, CannaMedical Pharma GmbH, Bionorica Ethics GmbH, CannaXan GmbH, Canopy Growth, Columbia Care, CTC Communications Corp., IMC Germany, Leafly Deutschland GmbH, Lundbeck, Nuvelution TS Pharma Inc., Resalo Vertrieb GmbH, Sanity Group, Syqe Medical Ltd., Therapix Biosciences Ltd., Tilray, and Wayland Group. She has received speaker’s fees from Aphria Deutschland GmbH, Cogitando GmbH, Emalex, Eurox Deutschland GmbH, Ever pharma GmbH, PR Berater, Spectrum Therapeutics GmbH, Tilray, and Wayland Group. She has received royalties from Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft Berlin, Elsevier, and Kohlhammer. She served as a Guest editor for Frontiers in Neurology on the research topic “The neurobiology and genetics of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: new avenues through large-scale collaborative projects”, and is Associate editor for “Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research”, Editorial Board Member for “Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids” and “MDPI-Reports”, and scientific board member for “Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin”. CG is supported by VolkswagenStiftung (Freigeist Fellowship) and served ad hoc as advisory board for Lundbeck. AC is author of the book “Pharmacological Treatment of Tics”. Cambridge University Press, 2020. PJH has received a payment as member of an advisory board meeting of Shire Pharmaceuticals and has carried out a clinical trial in cooperation with Servier. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Footnotes

1

We use the term TS in these guidelines, wherever information also applies to other forms of tic disorders. Only if there are substantial, well-known differences between TS and other forms of tic disorders we use TS or other terms, e.g. transient or chronic motor tic disorder.

This article is part of the focused issue “Update of the European clinical guidelines for Tourette Syndrome and other tic disorders”.

Change history

11/29/2021

The original publication was revised due to update in article note.

References

  • 1.Roessner V, Rothenberger A, Rickards H, Hoekstra PJ. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;20:153–154. doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0165-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Farag M, Stern JS, Simmons H, Robertson MM. Serial pharmacological prescribing practices for tic management in Tourette syndrome. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2015;30:435–441. doi: 10.1002/hup.2495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pringsheim T, Okun MS, Müller-Vahl K, et al. Practice guideline recommendations summary: treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology. 2019;92:896–906. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pringsheim T, Holler-Managan Y, Okun MS, et al. Comprehensive systematic review summary: treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology. 2019;92:907–915. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hollis C, Pennant M, Cuenca J, et al. Clinical effectiveness and patient perspectives of different treatment strategies for tics in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome: a systematic review and qualitative analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–450. doi: 10.3310/hta20040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang C, Hao Z, Zhang L-L, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of antipsychotic drugs for tic disorders: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2019;52:7–15. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Z, Yang C, Zhang L-L, et al. Pharmacotherapies to tics: a systematic review. Oncotarget. 2018;9:28240–28266. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Whittington C, Pennant M, Kendall T, et al. Practitioner review: treatments for Tourette syndrome in children and young people—a systematic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57:988–1004. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Waldon K, Hill J, Termine C, et al. Trials of pharmacological interventions for Tourette syndrome: a systematic review. Behav Neurol. 2013;26:265–273. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-120269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pringsheim T, Doja A, Gorman D, et al. Canadian guidelines for the evidence-based treatment of tic disorders: pharmacotherapy. Can J Psychiatry. 2012;57:133–143. doi: 10.1177/070674371205700302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Neurological Group, Branch of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of tic disorder in children 2017. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr. 2017;32:1137–1140. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu Z-S, Cui Y-H, Sun D, et al. Current status, diagnosis, and treatment recommendation for tic disorders in China. Front Psychiatry. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cavanna AE. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome as a paradigmatic neuropsychiatric disorder. CNS Spectr. 2018;23:213–218. doi: 10.1017/S1092852918000834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cavanna AE, Seri S. Tourette’s syndrome. BMJ. 2013;347:f4964. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cavanna AE, Termine C. Tourette syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;724:375–383. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0653-2_28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deeb W, Malaty IA, Mathews CA. Tourette disorder and other tic disorders. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;165:123–153. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64012-3.00008-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Efron D, Dale RC. Tics and Tourette syndrome. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54:1148–1153. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ganos C. Tics and Tourette’s: update on pathophysiology and tic control. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29:513–518. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ganos C, Martino D, Pringsheim T. Tics in the pediatric population: pragmatic management. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2017;4:160–172. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ganos C, Martino D. Tics and Tourette syndrome. Neurol Clin. 2015;33:115–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gravino G. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2013;25:297–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Greydanus DE, Tullio J. Tourette’s disorder in children and adolescents. Transl Pediatr. 2020;9:S94–S103. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.09.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gunduz A, Okun MS. A review and update on Tourette syndrome: where is the field headed? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16:37. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0633-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hallett M. Tourette syndrome: update. Brain Dev. 2015;37:651–655. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jankovic J. Therapeutic developments for tics and myoclonus. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1566–1573. doi: 10.1002/mds.26414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Macerollo A, Martino D. What is new in tics, dystonia and chorea? Clin Med (Lond) 2016;16:383–389. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-4-383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McNaught KSP, Mink JW. Advances in understanding and treatment of Tourette syndrome. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7:667–676. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mills S, Hedderly T. A guide to childhood motor stereotypies, tic disorders and the Tourette spectrum for the primary care practitioner. Ulster Med J. 2014;83:22–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mittal SO. Tics and Tourette’s syndrome. Drugs Context. 2020 doi: 10.7573/dic.2019-12-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Novotny M, Valis M, Klimova B. Tourette syndrome: a mini-review. Front Neurol. 2018;9:139. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Plessen KJ. Tic disorders and Tourette’s syndrome. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;22(Suppl 1):S55–S60. doi: 10.1007/s00787-012-0362-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pringsheim T. Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders of childhood. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;112:853–856. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52910-7.00005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Robertson MM. A personal 35 year perspective on Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: assessment, investigations, and management. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:88–104. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00133-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Robertson MM, Eapen V, Singer HS, et al. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:16097. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Robertson MM. The Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: the current status. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2012;97:166–175. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shaw ZA, Coffey BJ. Tics and Tourette syndrome. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2014;37:269–286. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2014.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Singer HS. Tics and Tourette syndrome. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2019;25:936–958. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stern JS. Tourette’s syndrome and its borderland. Pract Neurol. 2018;18:262–270. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2017-001755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Augustine F, Singer HS. Merging the pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy of tics. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (NY) 2018;8:595. doi: 10.7916/D8H14JTX. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Billnitzer A, Jankovic J. Current management of tics and tourette syndrome: behavioral, pharmacologic, and surgical treatments. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17:1681–1693. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00914-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chadehumbe MA, Brown LW. Advances in the treatment of Tourette’s disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:31. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1018-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cothros N, Medina A, Pringsheim T. Current pharmacotherapy for tic disorders. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21:567–580. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1721465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Egolf A, Coffey BJ. Current pharmacotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of Tourette syndrome. Drugs Today (Barc) 2014;50:159–179. doi: 10.1358/dot.2014.50.2.2097801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Essoe JK-Y, Grados MA, Singer HS, et al. Evidence-based treatment of Tourette’s disorder and chronic tic disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2019;19:1103–1115. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1643236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hartmann A, Martino D, Murphy T. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome—a treatable condition? Rev Neurol (Paris) 2016;172:446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hartmann A, Worbe Y. Pharmacological treatment of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:1157–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hartmann A, Worbe Y. Tourette syndrome: clinical spectrum, mechanisms and personalized treatments. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31:504–509. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jankovic J. Treatment of tics associated with Tourette syndrome. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02105-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jimenez-Shahed J. Medical and surgical treatments of Tourette syndrome. Neurol Clin. 2020;38:349–366. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2020.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Malaty IA, Akbar U. Updates in medical and surgical therapies for Tourette syndrome. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014;14:458. doi: 10.1007/s11910-014-0458-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mogwitz S, Buse J, Ehrlich S, Roessner V. Clinical pharmacology of dopamine-modulating agents in Tourette’s syndrome. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;112:281–349. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-411546-0.00010-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mogwitz S, Buse J, Wolff N, Roessner V. Update on the pharmacological treatment of tics with dopamine-modulating agents. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2018;9:651–672. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pandey S, Dash D. Progress in pharmacological and surgical management of Tourette syndrome and other chronic tic disorders. Neurologist. 2019;24:93–108. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Quezada J, Coffman KA. Current approaches and new developments in the pharmacological management of Tourette syndrome. CNS Drugs. 2018;32:33–45. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0486-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rizzo R, Gulisano M. Treatment options for tic disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2020;20:55–63. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1698950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Roessner V, Schoenefeld K, Buse J, et al. Pharmacological treatment of tic disorders and Tourette syndrome. Neuropharmacology. 2013;68:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Roth J. The colorful spectrum of Tourette syndrome and its medical, surgical and behavioral therapies. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;46(Suppl 1):S75–S79. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Seideman MF, Seideman TA. A review of the current treatment of Tourette syndrome. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2020;25:401–412. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-25.5.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Serajee FJ, Mahbubul Huq AHM. Advances in Tourette syndrome: diagnoses and treatment. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62:687–701. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2015.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shprecher DR, Schrock L, Himle M. Neurobehavioral aspects, pathophysiology, and management of Tourette syndrome. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014;27:484–492. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shprecher DR, Kious BM, Himle MH. Advances in mechanistic understanding and treatment approaches to Tourette syndrome. Discov Med. 2015;20:295–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tagwerker Gloor F, Walitza S. Tic disorders and Tourette syndrome: current concepts of etiology and treatment in children and adolescents. Neuropediatrics. 2016;47:84–96. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Thenganatt MA, Jankovic J (2016) Recent advances in understanding and managing Tourette syndrome. F1000Res 5. 10.12688/f1000research.7424.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 64.Thomas R, Cavanna AE. The pharmacology of Tourette syndrome. J Neural Transm. 2013;120:689–694. doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-0979-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cox JH, Seri S, Cavanna AE. Safety and efficacy of aripiprazole for the treatment of pediatric Tourette syndrome and other chronic tic disorders. Pediatr Health Med Ther. 2016;7:57–64. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S87121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ghanizadeh A. Systemic review of aripiprazole for the treatment of children and adolescents with tic disorders. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2012;17:200–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Janik P, Szejko N. Aripiprazole in treatment of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome—new therapeutic option. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018;52:84–87. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Liu Y, Ni H, Wang C, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole in children and adolescents with Tourette’s disorder: a meta-analysis. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016;26:436–441. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang S, Wei Y-Z, Yang J-H, et al. The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole for tic disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2017;254:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yang C, Yi Q, Zhang L, et al. Safety of aripiprazole for tics in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e15816. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yang C-S, Huang H, Zhang L-L, et al. Aripiprazole for the treatment of tic disorders in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0504-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zheng W, Li X-B, Xiang Y-Q, et al. Aripiprazole for Tourette’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2016;31:11–18. doi: 10.1002/hup.2498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Budman CL. The role of atypical antipsychotics for treatment of Tourette’s syndrome: an overview. Drugs. 2014;74:1177–1193. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0254-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Anandan C, Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin in movement disorders: an update. Toxins (Basel) 2021 doi: 10.3390/toxins13010042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Anandan S, Wigg CL, Thomas CR, Coffey B. Psychosurgery for self-injurious behavior in Tourette’s disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2004;14:531–538. doi: 10.1089/cap.2004.14.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Awan KH. The therapeutic usage of botulinum toxin (Botox) in non-cosmetic head and neck conditions—an evidence based review. Saudi Pharm J. 2017;25:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Camargo CHF, Teive HAG. Use of botulinum toxin for movement disorders. Drugs Context. 2019 doi: 10.7573/dic.212586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hallett M, Albanese A, Dressler D, et al. Evidence-based review and assessment of botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of movement disorders. Toxicon. 2013;67:94–114. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Jankovic J. An update on new and unique uses of botulinum toxin in movement disorders. Toxicon. 2018;147:84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lotia M, Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of tremor and tics. Semin Neurol. 2016;36:54–63. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1571217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Moretti A. Is botulinum toxin effective and safe for motor and phonic tics in patients affected by Tourette syndrome? A Cochrane Review summary with commentary. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62:274–276. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Persaud R, Garas G, Silva S, et al. An evidence-based review of botulinum toxin (Botox) applications in non-cosmetic head and neck conditions. JRSM Short Rep. 2013;4:10. doi: 10.1177/2042533312472115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Safarpour Y, Jabbari B. Botulinum toxin treatment of movement disorders. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2018;20:4. doi: 10.1007/s11940-018-0488-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tater P, Pandey S. Botulinum toxin in movement disorders. Neurol India. 2018;66:S79–S89. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.226441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Thenganatt MA, Fahn S. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of movement disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012;12:399–409. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0286-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Artukoglu BB, Bloch MH. The potential of cannabinoid-based treatments in Tourette syndrome. CNS Drugs. 2019;33:417–430. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00627-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Koppel BS. Cannabis in the treatment of dystonia, dyskinesias, and tics. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12:788–792. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0376-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Müller-Vahl KR. Treatment of Tourette syndrome with cannabinoids. Behav Neurol. 2013;27:119–124. doi: 10.3233/BEN-120276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wang S, Wei Y-Z, Yang J, et al. Clonidine adhesive patch for the treatment of tic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017;21:614–620. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Weisman H, Qureshi IA, Leckman JF, et al. Systematic review: pharmacological treatment of tic disorders—efficacy of antipsychotic and alpha-2 adrenergic agonist agents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:1162–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kumar A, Duda L, Mainali G, et al. A comprehensive review of Tourette syndrome and complementary alternative medicine. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2018;5:95–100. doi: 10.1007/s40474-018-0137-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Paton DM. Deutetrabenazine: treatment of hyperkinetic aspects of Huntington’s disease, tardive dyskinesia and Tourette syndrome. Drugs Today (Barc) 2017;53:89–102. doi: 10.1358/dot.2017.53.2.2589164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hartmann A. Clinical pharmacology of nondopaminergic drugs in Tourette syndrome. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;112:351–372. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-411546-0.00011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Qi H, Liu R, Zheng W, et al. Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for Tourette’s syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;47:101853. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.101853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yang C-S, Zhang L-L, Zeng L-N, et al. Topiramate for Tourette’s syndrome in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49:344–350. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yu L, Yan J, Wen F, et al. Revisiting the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate for tic disorders: a meta-analysis. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2020 doi: 10.1089/cap.2019.0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.El Malhany N, Gulisano M, Rizzo R, Curatolo P. Tourette syndrome and comorbid ADHD: causes and consequences. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174:279–288. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2417-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ogundele MO, Ayyash HF. Review of the evidence for the management of co-morbid tic disorders in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. World J Clin Pediatr. 2018;7:36–42. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v7.i1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Osland ST, Steeves TD, Pringsheim T (2018) Pharmacological treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children with comorbid tic disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD007990. 10.1002/14651858.CD007990.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 100.Pringsheim T, Steeves T (2011) Pharmacological treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children with comorbid tic disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD007990. 10.1002/14651858.CD007990.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 101.Rizzo R, Gulisano M, Calì PV, Curatolo P. Tourette Syndrome and comorbid ADHD: current pharmacological treatment options. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2013;17:421–428. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Rizzo R, Gulisano M. Clinical pharmacology of comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Tourette syndrome. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;112:415–444. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-411546-0.00014-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Yang R, Li R, Gao W, Zhao Z. Tic symptoms induced by atomoxetine in treatment of ADHD: a case report and literature review. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017;38:151–154. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Neri V, Cardona F. Clinical pharmacology of comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder in Tourette syndrome. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;112:391–414. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-411546-0.00013-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Rothenberger A, Roessner V. Psychopharmacotherapy of obsessive-compulsive symptoms within the framework of Tourette syndrome. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2019;17:703–709. doi: 10.2174/1570159X16666180828095131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Martino D, Hedderly T. Tics and stereotypies: a comparative clinical review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;59:117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Rajapakse T, Pringsheim T. Pharmacotherapeutics of Tourette syndrome and stereotypies in autism. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2010;17:254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2010.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Madruga-Garrido M, Mir P. Tics and other stereotyped movements as side effects of pharmacological treatment. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;112:481–494. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-411546-0.00016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rath JJG, Deen MEJ, van Houten H, et al. Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in Tourette syndrome. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2017;7:201–205. doi: 10.1177/2045125317705012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kious BM, Jimenez-Shahed J, Shprecher DR. Treatment-refractory Tourette Syndrome. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016;70:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Roessner V, Plessen KJ, Rothenberger A, et al. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Part II: pharmacological treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;20:173–196. doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0163-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Buse J, Schoenefeld K, Münchau A, Roessner V. Neuromodulation in Tourette syndrome: dopamine and beyond. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:1069–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Putignano D, Clavenna A, Reale L, Bonati M. The evidence-based choice for antipsychotics in children and adolescents should be guaranteed. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;75:769–776. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02641-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bruun RD. Subtle and underrecognized side effects of neuroleptic treatment in children with Tourette’s disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145:621–624. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.5.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Singer HS. Treatment of tics and tourette syndrome. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2010;12:539–561. doi: 10.1007/s11940-010-0095-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Roessner V, Wolff N, Ehrlich S, Waltereit R. Need for a more developmental perspective: QTc prolongation under psychotropic medication. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;26:871–873. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1028-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Haddad PM, Wieck A. Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia: mechanisms, clinical features and management. Drugs. 2004;64:2291–2314. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464200-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Ho J, Panagiotopoulos C, McCrindle B, et al. Management recommendations for metabolic complications associated with second-generation antipsychotic use in children and youth. Paediatr Child Health. 2011;16:575–580. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Pringsheim T, Pearce M. Complications of antipsychotic therapy in children with Tourette syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2010;43:17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Solmi M, Fornaro M, Ostinelli EG, et al. Safety of 80 antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-attention-deficit/hyperactivity medications and mood stabilizers in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders: a large scale systematic meta-review of 78 adverse effects. World Psychiatry. 2020;19:214–232. doi: 10.1002/wps.20765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Eddy CM, Rickards HE, Cavanna AE. Treatment strategies for tics in Tourette syndrome. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2011;4:25–45. doi: 10.1177/1756285610390261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pringsheim T, Marras C (2009) Pimozide for tics in Tourette’s syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006996. 10.1002/14651858.CD006996.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 123.Rizzo R, Eddy CM, Calí P, et al. Metabolic effects of aripiprazole and pimozide in children with Tourette syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2012;47:419–422. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2012.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Yang C, Hao Z, Zhu C, et al. Interventions for tic disorders: an overview of systematic reviews and meta analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;63:239–255. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Gulisano M, Calì PV, Cavanna AE, et al. Cardiovascular safety of aripiprazole and pimozide in young patients with Tourette syndrome. Neurol Sci. 2011;32:1213–1217. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0678-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Janssen PA, Niemegeers CJ, Awouters F, et al. Pharmacology of risperidone (R 64 766), a new antipsychotic with serotonin-S2 and dopamine-D2 antagonistic properties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;244:685–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Ghanizadeh A, Haghighi A. Aripiprazole versus risperidone for treating children and adolescents with tic disorder: a randomized double blind clinical trial. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2014;45:596–603. doi: 10.1007/s10578-013-0427-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Pringsheim T, Ho J, Sarna JR, et al. Feasibility and relevance of antipsychotic safety monitoring in children with Tourette syndrome: a prospective longitudinal study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017;37:498–504. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Calarge CA, Xie D, Fiedorowicz JG, et al. Rate of weight gain and cardiometabolic abnormalities in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2012;161:1010–1015. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Barton BB, Segger F, Fischer K, et al. Update on weight-gain caused by antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2020;19:295–314. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1713091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Burris KD, Molski TF, Xu C, et al. Aripiprazole, a novel antipsychotic, is a high-affinity partial agonist at human dopamine D2 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;302:381–389. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.033175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Lawler CP, Prioleau C, Lewis MM, et al. Interactions of the novel antipsychotic aripiprazole (OPC-14597) with dopamine and serotonin receptor subtypes. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;20:612–627. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00099-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Kikuchi T, Tottori K, Uwahodo Y, et al. 7-(4-[4-(2,3-Dichlorophenyl)-1-piperazinyl]butyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone (OPC-14597), a new putative antipsychotic drug with both presynaptic dopamine autoreceptor agonistic activity and postsynaptic D2 receptor antagonistic activity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274:329–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Jordan S, Koprivica V, Chen R, et al. The antipsychotic aripiprazole is a potent, partial agonist at the human 5-HT1A receptor. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;441:137–140. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)01532-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Wenzel C, Kleimann A, Bokemeyer S, Müller-Vahl KR. Aripiprazole for the treatment of Tourette syndrome: a case series of 100 patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32:548–550. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31825ac2cb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Sallee F, Kohegyi E, Zhao J, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of oral aripiprazole for the treatment of Tourette’s disorder in children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Yoo HK, Joung YS, Lee J-S, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aripiprazole in children and adolescents with Tourette’s disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74:e772–780. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Zheng Y, Zhang Z-J, Han X-M, et al. A proprietary herbal medicine (5-Ling Granule) for Tourette syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57:74–83. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Wang L-J, Chou W-J, Chou M-C, Gau SS-F. The Effectiveness of aripiprazole for tics, social adjustment, and parental stress in children and adolescents with Tourette’s disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016;26:442–448. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Salvador A, Worbe Y, Delorme C, et al. Specific effect of a dopamine partial agonist on counterfactual learning: evidence from Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06547-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:951–962. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60733-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Bernagie C, Danckaerts M, Wampers M, De Hert M. Aripiprazole and acute extrapyramidal symptoms in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. CNS Drugs. 2016;30:807–818. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0367-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Pillinger T, McCutcheon RA, Vano L, et al. Comparative effects of 18 antipsychotics on metabolic function in patients with schizophrenia, predictors of metabolic dysregulation, and association with psychopathology: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:64–77. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30416-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Bachmann CJ, Roessner V, Glaeske G, Hoffmann F. Trends in psychopharmacologic treatment of tic disorders in children and adolescents in Germany. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;24:199–207. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0563-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Dose M, Lange HW. The benzamide tiapride: treatment of extrapyramidal motor and other clinical syndromes. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2000;33:19–27. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-7964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Eggers C, Rothenberger A, Berghaus U. Clinical and neurobiological findings in children suffering from tic disease following treatment with tiapride. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1988;237:223–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00449911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Fekete S, Egberts K, Preissler T, et al. Estimation of a preliminary therapeutic reference range for children and adolescents with tic disorders treated with tiapride. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;77:163–170. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03000-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Soares KV, McGrath JJ (1999) The treatment of tardive dyskinesia—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 39:1–16; discussion 17–18. 10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00021-3 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 149.Song P-P, Jiang L, Li X-J, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of the clonidine transdermal patch in the treatment for children with tic disorders: a prospective, open, single-group. Self-controlled study. Front Neurol. 2017;8:32. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Hirota T, Schwartz S, Correll CU. Alpha-2 agonists for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of monotherapy and add-on trials to stimulant therapy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53:153–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Reid JL, Campbell BC, Hamilton CA (1984) Withdrawal reactions following cessation of central alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists. Hypertension 6:II71–II75. 10.1161/01.hyp.6.5_pt_2.ii71 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 152.Daviss WB, Patel NC, Robb AS, et al. Clonidine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: II. ECG changes and adverse events analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:189–198. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31815d9ae4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Murphy TK, Fernandez TV, Coffey BJ, et al. Extended-release guanfacine does not show a large effect on tic severity in children with chronic tic disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017;27:762–770. doi: 10.1089/cap.2017.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Sallee F, McGough J, Wigal T, et al. Guanfacine extended release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;48(2):155–165. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318191769e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Elbe D, Perel-Panar C, Wicholas L. Manic reaction in a child induced by guanfacine-extended release. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016;26:566–567. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Horrigan JP, Barnhill LJ. Guanfacine and secondary mania in children. J Affect Disord. 1999;54:309–314. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00183-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Sandyk R, Awerbuch G. Marijuana and Tourette’s syndrome. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1988;8:444–445. doi: 10.1097/00004714-198812000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Milosev LM, Psathakis N, Szejko N, et al. Treatment of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome with cannabis-based medicine: results from a retrospective analysis and online survey. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2019;4:265–274. doi: 10.1089/can.2018.0050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Black N, Stockings E, Campbell G, et al. Cannabinoids for the treatment of mental disorders and symptoms of mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6:995–1010. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30401-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Müller-Vahl KR, Schneider U, Prevedel H, et al. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is effective in the treatment of tics in Tourette syndrome: a 6-week randomized trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:459–465. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Müller-Vahl KR, Schneider U, Koblenz A, et al. Treatment of Tourette’s syndrome with delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC): a randomized crossover trial. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2002;35:57–61. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-25028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Marras C, Andrews D, Sime E, Lang AE. Botulinum toxin for simple motor tics: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Neurology. 2001;56:605–610. doi: 10.1212/WNL.56.5.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Abuzzahab FS, Brown VL. Control of Tourette’s syndrome with topiramate. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:968. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Jankovic J, Jimenez-Shahed J, Brown LW. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in the treatment of Tourette syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2010;81:70–73. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.185348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Choi J, Yoon D, Park M, et al. Topiramate-related adverse events: pattern and signals in the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System, 2010–2017. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e22669. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Müller O, Rothenberger A, Brüni GL, et al. Questioning the long-term stability of the additive model in comorbid CTD+ADHD—the transition from childhood to adulthood. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Roessner V, Becker A, Banaschewski T, Rothenberger A. Psychopathological profile in children with chronic tic disorder and co-existing ADHD: additive effects. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007;35:79–85. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9086-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Cardona F, Rizzo R. Treatment of psychiatric comorbidities in Tourette syndromes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Groth C, Mol Debes N, Rask CU, et al. Course of Tourette syndrome and comorbidities in a large prospective clinical study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56:304–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Groth C. Tourette syndrome in a longitudinal perspective. Clinical course of tics and comorbidities, coexisting psychopathologies, phenotypes and predictors. Dan Med J. 2018;65:155–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Castellanos FX. Stimulants and tic disorders: from dogma to data. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:337–338. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Roessner V, Robatzek M, Knapp G, et al. First-onset tics in patients with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: impact of stimulants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:616–621. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Tourette’s Syndrome Study Group Treatment of ADHD in children with tics: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2002;58:527–536. doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.4.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Palumbo D, Spencer T, Lynch J, et al. Emergence of tics in children with ADHD: impact of once-daily OROS methylphenidate therapy. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2004;14:185–194. doi: 10.1089/1044546041649138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Masi G, Gagliano A, Siracusano R, et al. Aripiprazole in children with Tourette’s disorder and co-morbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a 12-week, open-label, preliminary study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2012;22:120–125. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Hirschtritt ME, Lee PC, Pauls DL, et al. Lifetime prevalence, age of risk, and genetic relationships of comorbid psychiatric disorders in Tourette syndrome. JAMA Psychiat. 2015;72:325–333. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Conelea CA, Walther MR, Freeman JB, et al. Tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): phenomenology and treatment outcome in the pediatric OCD treatment study II. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53:1308–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.March JS, Franklin ME, Leonard H, et al. Tics moderate treatment outcome with sertraline but not cognitive-behavior therapy in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61:344–347. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Bloch MH, Landeros-Weisenberger A, Kelmendi B, et al. A systematic review: antipsychotic augmentation with treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11:622–632. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Masi G, Pfanner C, Brovedani P. Antipsychotic augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in resistant tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents: a naturalistic comparative study. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:1007–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Veale D, Miles S, Smallcombe N, et al. Atypical antipsychotic augmentation in SSRI treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:317. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0317-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Fernández de la Cruz L, Rydell M, Runeson B, et al. Suicide in Tourette’s and chronic tic disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;82:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Bartram LA, Lozano J, Coury DL. Aripiprazole for treating irritability associated with autism spectrum disorders. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019;20:1421–1427. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1626825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Findling RL, Youngstrom EA, Rowles BM, et al. A double-blind and placebo-controlled trial of aripiprazole in symptomatic youths at genetic high risk for bipolar disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017;27:864–874. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Hirsch LE, Pringsheim T (2016) Aripiprazole for autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD009043. 10.1002/14651858.CD009043.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 186.Sandor P, Stephens RJ. Risperidone treatment of aggressive behavior in children with Tourette syndrome. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;20:710–712. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200012000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Wolff N, Hebebrand J, Roessner V. 19 Tics und motorische stereotypien. In: Remschmidt H, editor. Kinder- und jugendpsychiatrie und psychotherapie. 7. Heidelberg: Thieme Verlag; 2020. pp. 186–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Verdellen C, van de Griendt J, Hartmann A, et al. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Part III: behavioural and psychosocial interventions. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;20:197–207. doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0167-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Hamamura T, Harada T. Unique pharmacological profile of aripiprazole as the phasic component buster. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191:741–743. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0654-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Kapur S, Zipursky R, Jones C, et al. Relationship between dopamine D(2) occupancy, clinical response, and side effects: a double-blind PET study of first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:514–520. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Yokoi F, Gründer G, Biziere K, et al. Dopamine D2 and D3 receptor occupancy in normal humans treated with the antipsychotic drug aripiprazole (OPC 14597): a study using positron emission tomography and [11C]raclopride. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;27:248–259. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00304-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Rizzo R, Pellico A, Silvestri PR, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing behavioral, educational, and pharmacological treatments in youths with chronic tic disorder or Tourette syndrome. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Macerollo A, Martino D, Cavanna AE, et al. Refractoriness to pharmacological treatment for tics: a multicentre European audit. J Neurol Sci. 2016;366:136–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Posner J. The role of precision medicine in child psychiatry: what can we expect and when? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57:813–817. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.07.874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Roessner V, Rothe J, Kohls G, Schomerus G, Ehrlich S, Beste C. Taming the chaos?! Using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to tackle the complexity in mental health research. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;30(8):1143–8171146. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01836-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES