Table 5.
Comparisons about detection results between our method and other methods in heart section.
Method | RV | RA | LV | LA | DAO | mAP |
SSD | 60.27 | 62.43 | 67.61 | 54.21 | 74.67 | 63.84 |
YOLOv2 | 71.31 | 69.39 | 71.56 | 62.70 | 90.74 | 73.14 |
Faster R-CNN VGG16 | 85.52 | 81.15 | 87.11 | 80.59 | 95.57 | 85.99 |
Faster R-CNN Resnet50 | 89.44 | 83.59 | 90.78 | 85.47 | 94.01 | 88.66 |
Non-NM | 84.35 | 85.43 | 91.23 | 82.45 | 95.86 | 87.86 |
Our method | 93.03 | 95.71 | 95.65 | 93.76 | 97.34 | 95.10 |
DAO = descending aorta, LA = left atrium, LV = left ventricle, mAP = mean average precision, RA = right atrium, RV = right ventricle.