Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e024685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024685

Table 2.

The YGTSS for the BIP TIC ERP and BIP TIC HRT groups at all measure points

YGTSS BIP TIC ERP (n=12) BIP TIC HRT (n=11)
Mean (SD)* Within-group difference† Within-group effect size‡ Mean (SD)* Within-group difference† Within-group effect size‡
Coefficient (95% CI); p value Cohen’s d (95% CI) Coefficient (95% CI); p value Cohen’s d (95% CI)
Total Tic Severity Score
 Baseline 23.75 (5.26) 23.45 (6.88)
 Post-treatment 19.00 (7.48) −4.75 (−8.18 to −1.32); p=0.007¶ 0.73 (-0.10 to 1.56) 21.18 (6.19) −2.27 (−5.65 to 1.11); p=0.187 0.35 (−0.50 to 1.19)
 3-month follow-up§ 18.25 (4.54) −5.50 (−8.93 to −2.07); p=0.002¶ 1.12 (0.24 to 1.97) 20.18 (6.21) −3.27 (−6.65 to 0.11); p=0.058 0.50 (−0.36 to 1.34)
 6-month follow-up 15.00 (7.01) −3.25 (−6.37 to −0.13); p=0.041¶ 0.55 (−0.27 to 1.36) 19.45 (7.47) −0.73 (−3.71 to 2.26); p=0.633 0.11 (−0.73 to 0.94)
 12-month follow-up 16.92 (5.55) −1.33 (−4.46 to 1.79); p=0.403 0.26 (−0.54 to 1.06) 19.36 (8.48) −0.82 (−3.80 to 2.17); p=0.591 0.11 (−0.73 to 0.95)
Motor Tic Severity
 Baseline 14.42 (1.73) 15.27 (1.85)
 Post-treatment 11.42 (4.17) −3.00 (−4.85 to −1.15); p=0.001¶ 0.94 (0.08 to 1.78) 13.18 (2.27) −2.09 (−3.65 to −0.53); p=0.009¶ 1.01 (0.11 to 1.89)
 3-month follow-up§ 12.33 (1.97) −2.08 (−3.93 to −0.24); p=0.027¶ 1.12 (0.25 to 1.98) 12.55 (2.70) −2.73 (−4.29 to −1.17); p=0.001¶ 1.18 (0.26 to 2.08)
 6-month follow-up 9.67 (5.05) −2.67 (−4.69 to −0.64); p=0.010¶ 0.70 (−0.14 to 1.51) 12.55 (2.58) 0.00 (−1.25 to 1.25); p=1.000 0.00 (−0.84 to 0.84)
 12-month follow-up 10.58 (1.73) −1.75 (−3.77 to 0.27): p=0.090 0.94 (0.09 to 1.78) 12.36 (3.17) −0.18 (−1.43 to 1.07); p=0.775 0.06 (−0.77 to 0.90)
Vocal Tic Severity
 Baseline 9.33 (4.98) 8.18 (6.19)
 Post-treatment 7.58 (4.01) −1.75 (−4.17 to 0.67); p=0.156 0.39 (−0.43 to 1.19) 8.00 (5.37) −0.18 (−2.71 to 2.34); p=0.888 0.03 (−0.80 to 0.87)
 3-month follow-up§ 5.92 (4.72) −3.42 (−5.84 to −1.00; p=0.006¶ 0.70 (−0.13 to 1.52) 7.64 (4.76) −0.55 (−3.07 to 1.98); p=0.672 0.10 (−0.74 to 0.93)
 6-month follow-up 5.33 (4.68) −0.58 (−2.57 to 1.40); p=0.564 0.12 (−0.68 to 0.92) 6.91 (5.68) −0.73 (−2.85 to 1.40); p=0.503 0.14 (−0.70 to 0.97)
 12-month follow-up 6.33 (5.42) 0.42 (−1.57 to 2.40); p=0.680 −0.08 (−0.88 to 0.72) 7.00 (6.08) −0.64 (−2.76 to 1.49); p=0.558 0.12 (−0.72 to 0.95)
Impairment
 Baseline 16.67 (6.51) 17.27 (7.86)
 Post-treatment 6.67 (7.78) −10.00 (−13.83 to −6.17); p<0.001¶ 1.39 (0.48 to 2.28) 10.00 (7.75) −7.27 (−12.18 to −2.37); p=0.004¶ 0.93 (0.04 to 1.81)
 3-month follow-up§ 4.17 (5.15) −12.50 (−16.33 to −8.67); p<0.001¶ 2.13 (1.10 to 3.13) 8.18 (9.82) −9.09 (−14.00 to −4.19); p<0.001¶ 1.02 (0.12 to 1.90)
 6-month follow-up 1.67 (3.89) −2.50 (−5.25 to 0.25); p=0.075 0.55 (−0.27 to 1.36) 7.27 (9.05) −0.91 (−3.39 to 1.57); p=0.473 0.10 (−0.74 to 0.93)
 12-month follow-up 1.67 (3.89) −2.50 (−5.25 to 0.25); p=0.075 0.55 (−0.27 to 1.36) 7.27 (10.09) −0.91 (−3.39 to 1.57); p=0.473 0.09 (−0.75 to 0.93)

*Observed means.

†Coefficients at post-treatment and at the 3-month follow-up compare with baseline, while coefficients at the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups compare with the 3-month follow-up.

‡All Cohen’s d effect sizes are calculated from observed data. Post-treatment and the 3-month follow-up effect sizes compare to baseline, while the 6-month and 12-month follow-up effect sizes compare to the 3-month follow-up. Effect sizes of 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 are considered small, moderate and large, respectively.

§Primary endpoint.

¶Significant at an alpha level of 0.05.