Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 14;37(3):217–225. doi: 10.14366/usg.17046

Table 3.

Comparison of the preferences of the experienced and inexperienced readers

Subjective combined (chose CAD [S-Detect])
Pathologic findings No. (%) 95% CI
Experienced readers (n=47)a) 7 (14.9) 6.20-28.31
 Grayscale US Benign (n=20) Choose US (n=20) Benign (n=20)
Malignant (n=27) Choose US (n=20) Benign (n=18)
Malignancy (n=2)
Choose CAD (n=7) Benign (n=7)
Inexperienced readers (n=47)a) 19 (40.4) 26.37-55.73
 Grayscale US Benign (n=20) Choose US (n=14) Benign (n=14)
Choose CAD (n=6) Benign (n=5)
Malignancy (n=1)
Malignant (n=27) Choose US (n=14) Benign (n=12)
Malignancy (n=2)
Choose CAD (n=13) Benign (n=13)

CAD, computer-aided diagnosis; CI, confidence interval; US, ultrasonography.

a)

Discordance between US findings and CAD (S-Detect).